On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:51:41PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > I haven't read through this thread completely yet, but are you wanting > > patches applied to the current upstream trees before the merge, or are > > you good merging them into your local trees only? > > What is the intended scope for what goes into this repo? So far, > what's there is very verbs focused. Is your intent to pull in > non-verbs related interfaces (e.g. psm/psm2) as well? I see iwpm. > What about ibacm, opensm, or the distributed SA work? The intent is to cover the user space component of the kernel. So, if code is including uapi/rdma/* then it is a good candidate for this tree. libacm, I am unclear on. Is it the recommended userspace component for the netlink socket that Kaike? Is it coupled to librdmacm? If yes it should probably come too. psm/psm2, I have no knowledge about this, it seems to meet the qualification, but I haven't seen it follow a community model? I don't have an impression that Intel would view that favorably.. opensm is not qualified since it rides on the other libraries. Not sure what distributed SA encompasses.. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
