Hi! > I'm not sure what hardware model you were thinking of, > but that approach doesn't seem like it can be "right" > for all hardware. The very thing that enables you to > enter the deepest sleep state might be that you had > already stopped using the 48MHz clock, PLL shut down. > That's a real world example from OMAP(*). > > So that issue is what I said: "don't restart". You > were talking about "don't stop". Well, in case of suspend-to-disk, there's no need to really enter deep sleep during freeze, right? I'm arguing "freeze/unfreeze" can be very fast. No need to play with partial trees, because "freeze/unfreeze" can be fast and it is easier that way. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
