swsusp & modules [was Re: [linux-pm] [Fwd: Re: PM messages]]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> I'm not sure what hardware model you were thinking of,
> but that approach doesn't seem like it can be "right"
> for all hardware.  The very thing that enables you to
> enter the deepest sleep state might be that you had
> already stopped using the 48MHz clock, PLL shut down.
> That's a real world example from OMAP(*).
> 
> So that issue is what I said:  "don't restart".  You
> were talking about "don't stop".

Well, in case of suspend-to-disk, there's no need to really enter deep
sleep during freeze, right?

I'm arguing "freeze/unfreeze" can be very fast. No need to play with
partial trees, because "freeze/unfreeze" can be fast and it is easier
that way.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux