Re: False advertising (was: C8000 cpu upgrade problem)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 15:42 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > But it seems that people on this list don't know about those HP locks too 
> > :-(
> 
> Most don't have any affiliation with HP.  I have been on this list a
> long time, and don't believe this issue has been discussed before,
> although the kernel maintainers may be aware of it.
> 
> In general, this kind of hardware information is proprietory.  The
> PC architecture only opened up because of a lot of competition and
> reverse engineering.  Even there, you may need a NDA to access some
> documentation.  It costs $3000/year to access PCI-SIG documents, etc.
> 
> James, what kind of firmware update is needed?

I have no idea ... I'm only deducing this from what had to be done to
ion to make it a 4-way.  We had similar upgrades to some of the A180s as
well.  It is unusual for a workstation class system, but the "too many
CPUs" message seems definitive.  Perhaps the firmware is essentially the
same as a server class and it's inheriting this behaviour.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux