* Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120614 05:00]: > Hi Tony, > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 17:22:08, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120614 03:43]: > > > + t.clk_activation = fclk_offset_ns; > > > + > > > > This too should be fclk_offset, not fclk_offset_ns. > > As gpmc_cs_set_timing convert it to ticks from ns, > shouldn't we put it in ns ? Hmm I see, something's wrong though.. Some of these we really want to specify as ticks instead of ns. Your patch was using 1 tick value as 1 ns value, which won't work. When I changed it back to what I thought was ticks, it just happened to work probably because of rounding. That's probably the reason why some of these have been set directly with gpmc_cs_write_reg as that sets tick values directly. It seems that we need to still allow both ns and tick values. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
