* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [120613 04:36]: > * Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120612 22:00]: > > Hi Jon, > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:06:53, Hunter, Jon wrote: > > > > > Should you at least warn, if you are going to over-write a value? > > > > Yes, that would be better except for too much logging, if Tony > > prefers that way I will add. > > If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should > test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done, > then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable > NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings. Actually this patch breaks at least DMA on tusb6010 on n8x0. That's a MUSB hardware in a wrapper connected to GPMC that's very picky with the timings. Got any hints what should be done with the cycle2cycle stuff for tusb6010? Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
