Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120612 22:00]:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 23:06:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> 
> > Should you at least warn, if you are going to over-write a value?
> 
> Yes, that would be better except for too much logging, if Tony
> prefers that way I will add. 

If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should
test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done,
then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable
NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux