Hi Tony, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:24:45, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should > > test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done, > > then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable > > NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings. > > Actually this patch breaks at least DMA on tusb6010 on n8x0. That's > a MUSB hardware in a wrapper connected to GPMC that's very picky with > the timings. > > Got any hints what should be done with the cycle2cycle stuff for > tusb6010? Not as of now, let me try to find out. Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
