* Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120614 03:15]: > Hi Tony, > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:28:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 17:24:45, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > If there's a chance it causing file system corruption, we should > > > > test it carefully on the boards before applying. If that's done, > > > > then there's probably no need for warnings. It's safer to disable > > > > NAND for untested boards if there's a chance of breaking the timings. > > > > > > Actually this patch breaks at least DMA on tusb6010 on n8x0. That's > > > a MUSB hardware in a wrapper connected to GPMC that's very picky with > > > the timings. > > > > > > Got any hints what should be done with the cycle2cycle stuff for > > > tusb6010? > > > > Not as of now, let me try to find out. > > Probably with the below patch [1], we can get values set by bootloader & > calculate back value to entered in Kernel, of course that may not work > if tusb6010 works with different gpmc i/p frequency. Well I took a look at the values, and it seems the only difference is the static GPMC_CONFIG1_CLKACTIVATIONTIME(1) that your patch now overwrites 0. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
