On 23/04/18 19:03, Tony Lindgren wrote: > I guess I'm not fully clued into what all is missing. I was just > thinking what I noticed we're missing weston a while back. See the > test hack hack below, only compile tested. I have not played with > weston at least for a year. But yeah I guess we still need dirtyfb > support too and can't make omap_crtc_dss_start_update() do all the > work for us? Yes, we need dirtyfb support too. I would think the dirtying mechanism will call omap_crtc_dss_start_update(). > /me thinks we're best of having the command mode displays working > through all these changes though as then we can easily veirfy no > regressions happen. I believe Sebastian already agreed to help > with any changes needed few months ago. My point was that as we don't support manual update, there can be no regressions. With the current mainline code, if we so want, we can just rm panel-dsi-cm and implement it and the related DSI code from scratch using the DRM's panels. That's a lot easier than going from panel-dsi-cm to DRM panels gradually, step by step, changing all the components in the pipeline piece by piece and keeping things working after each commit. Tomi -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
