* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> [180420 08:32]: > On 19/04/18 21:49, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> Works for me. Or let's just get the framedone interrupts > >> working if that fixes it. > > > > Both solutions work for me, but yes, getting framedone merged would be > > really nice. Phones without displays are not too useful, and patches > > were available for at least half a year now... > > It's not about framedone interrupts, but the whole manual update machinery. OK so not usable as a fix then. > I'm very reluctant to merge the series (there are also some unsolved > work with the series), as it's adding more omapdrm specific > functionality to the driver. > > Getting omapdrm to be a proper DRM driver is the topmost priority at the > moment, and Laurent has been doing a lot of work to accomplish that > (something like 100+ patches, many still unmerged). Anything that makes > that work more difficult goes to the bottom of my list. Sure, let's do it in a maintainable way. But please reorient your "bottom of the list" attitude though. We do have a case of a bunch of people and real distros trying to use this thing. With mainline kernel. After all that's what makes Linux kernel community :) > When that work has been done, and omapdrm is using common DRM panels and > bridges, I'm happy to merge manual update support. Hmm it seems that with the "refresh on pageflip" suggestion Sebastian's series would be not intrusive at all? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
