On 13/04/16 10:16, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 04/13/2016 09:11 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> On 13/04/16 09:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>> On 04/12/2016 11:04 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>>> While at it, do you want to fix up (+Seb): >>>>> a) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-pxa-pci-ce4100.txt which >>>>> also seems to refer to ti,pcf in example (introduced by df2634f43f51 >>>>> x86: dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 ) >>>>> b) arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts as well? >>>> >>>> Applying this one with Roger's ack, seems like those should be >>>> additional patches. >>> >>> Okay. I looked it up on the board and it says NXP PCF8575 and not TI. >>> TI's was probably the first hit while I was looking for it (I think >>> CE4100 manual mentioned just PCF8575). >>> >>> But if it would have a TI branding on it I would keep the TI prefix in >>> front and add the NXP prefix. As of today we might not know a >>> functional difference between those two but this does not mean we might >>> find one in the future. >>> That said, are you people sure that the DRA7 has a TI or a NXP branding >>> on it? >> >> Board has a Texas Instruments part: PCF8575PWR TSSOP24. >> http://www.ti.com/product/PCF8575 > > So this sounds like > > compatible = "ti,pcf8575", "nxp,pcf8575"; > > then. Agree with you. -- cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
