On 04/13/2016 09:11 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 13/04/16 09:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> On 04/12/2016 11:04 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>> While at it, do you want to fix up (+Seb): >>>> a) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-pxa-pci-ce4100.txt which >>>> also seems to refer to ti,pcf in example (introduced by df2634f43f51 >>>> x86: dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 ) >>>> b) arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts as well? >>> >>> Applying this one with Roger's ack, seems like those should be >>> additional patches. >> >> Okay. I looked it up on the board and it says NXP PCF8575 and not TI. >> TI's was probably the first hit while I was looking for it (I think >> CE4100 manual mentioned just PCF8575). >> >> But if it would have a TI branding on it I would keep the TI prefix in >> front and add the NXP prefix. As of today we might not know a >> functional difference between those two but this does not mean we might >> find one in the future. >> That said, are you people sure that the DRA7 has a TI or a NXP branding >> on it? > > Board has a Texas Instruments part: PCF8575PWR TSSOP24. > http://www.ti.com/product/PCF8575 So this sounds like compatible = "ti,pcf8575", "nxp,pcf8575"; then. > > -- > cheers, > -roger Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
