On 13/04/16 09:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 04/12/2016 11:04 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> While at it, do you want to fix up (+Seb): >>> a) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-pxa-pci-ce4100.txt which >>> also seems to refer to ti,pcf in example (introduced by df2634f43f51 >>> x86: dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 ) >>> b) arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts as well? >> >> Applying this one with Roger's ack, seems like those should be >> additional patches. > > Okay. I looked it up on the board and it says NXP PCF8575 and not TI. > TI's was probably the first hit while I was looking for it (I think > CE4100 manual mentioned just PCF8575). > > But if it would have a TI branding on it I would keep the TI prefix in > front and add the NXP prefix. As of today we might not know a > functional difference between those two but this does not mean we might > find one in the future. > That said, are you people sure that the DRA7 has a TI or a NXP branding > on it? Board has a Texas Instruments part: PCF8575PWR TSSOP24. http://www.ti.com/product/PCF8575 -- cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
