The binding definition for the PCF857x GPIO expanders doesn't mention
a "ti,pcf8575" compatible string. This is apparently because TI is
only a second source - there is no functional difference between
PCF8575 chips manufactured by TI and NXP, and the same board might be
populated with either depending on availability.
This is not a problem in practice because the I2C core uses
of_modalias_node() before matching drivers and this strips the
manufacturer name.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Correct the claim that this is a practical problem.
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts
index cfc24e52244e..3907c9d2c12e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@
};
pcf_gpio_21: gpio@21 {
- compatible = "ti,pcf8575";
+ compatible = "nxp,pcf8575";
reg = <0x21>;
lines-initial-states = <0x1408>;
gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
index 00b12002c07c..7ec42bda3afb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@
};
pcf_gpio_21: gpio@21 {
- compatible = "ti,pcf8575";
+ compatible = "nxp,pcf8575";
reg = <0x21>;
lines-initial-states = <0x1408>;
gpio-controller;
--
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
