On 04/12/2016 11:04 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> While at it, do you want to fix up (+Seb): >> a) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-pxa-pci-ce4100.txt which >> also seems to refer to ti,pcf in example (introduced by df2634f43f51 >> x86: dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 ) >> b) arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts as well? > > Applying this one with Roger's ack, seems like those should be > additional patches. Okay. I looked it up on the board and it says NXP PCF8575 and not TI. TI's was probably the first hit while I was looking for it (I think CE4100 manual mentioned just PCF8575). But if it would have a TI branding on it I would keep the TI prefix in front and add the NXP prefix. As of today we might not know a functional difference between those two but this does not mean we might find one in the future. That said, are you people sure that the DRA7 has a TI or a NXP branding on it? > > Tony > Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
