On 01/13/2016 11:12 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 01/13/2016 06:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: [...] >> Care to dig up some more information on that? > > i can't find this report, sry - as i remember there was difference > between some OMAP4 HS and GP SoCs. > > But links on commits for old 3.4 kernel below: > http://omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=commitdiff;h=a7a516be9338eabc9a7682e7433fa34d86c1f208 > http://omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=commitdiff;h=262669aebf4af4044a25e8292f0e27986e18445a > >> >> I don't have anything against adding GPIO handling to the TWL driver >> so it can be optionally specified. But that's clearly a separate patch >> and should be done by somebody who knows more about the issue and has >> a test case needing the GPIO logic for this pin. >> > > if it helps in anyways http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/170707.html -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
