RE: tHigh tLow discussion (was [pacth] I2C bug fixes for L-O and L-Z)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> So, it might be worth considering my following proposition?"
> Now, from a s/w perspective, If we would like to have it so that we can
> configure tHigh and tLow based on devices, electrical characteristics on
> a bus, not just speed of the bus, the current implementation would
> probably need to change(I think).
> "
> maybe take tHigh, tLow as a platform data input to the driver? that
> could allow scaling for all boards I wonder?

Something like that I'd say. Something not happening soon, because
not everybody has a scope and the time =)

- Eero
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux