RE: tHigh tLow discussion (was [pacth] I2C bug fixes for L-O and L-Z)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> ;) Aye Aye.... I wonder if the equation you provided is based on
> emperical measurement? if so would it vary based on electrical
> characteristics of a platform? I mean beagleboard Vs Zoom Vs SDP
> atleast have variances of i2c trace lengths and number of devices per
> i2c bus.. wont the equation change based on board configuration?

Nothing empirical. It's just for one board.

They say it differs from board to board. I haven't had time to spend with different boards.
They call it the "load on scl line", that makes the numbers different on other
boards. (I'm not so sure about that, but agreed it may vary little)

That patch is reverted these days, as it is not really empirical, and doesn't work on omap2430.

- Eero
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux