On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Wendy Cheng <s.wendy.cheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > As statd runs this directly and reads name for -v from > > > > MY_NAME, > > > > > > Nope; see the -L option to statd. > > > > > > > So the let the user worry approach. Statd does not > > notify anyone and user is supposed to do it with > > sm-notify manually. This will work, but -n looks > > cleaner me.. > > Or we can do this ... > If user specified "statd -n", we run "sm-notify -v" command for them ? So > we don't need to fork the code but also keep someone happy ? Ok, so -n remains.. > Give me one day to see whether it is doable ? Given above 1.1.* probably works already, but it does not address the ANY bind - but do you even wish that to be addressed? -- // Janne -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
