Janne Karhunen wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:25 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As statd runs this directly and reads name for -v from
> MY_NAME,
Nope; see the -L option to statd.
So the let the user worry approach. Statd does not
notify anyone and user is supposed to do it with
sm-notify manually. This will work, but -n looks
cleaner me..
Or we can do this ...
If user specified "statd -n", we run "sm-notify -v" command for them ?
So we don't need to fork the code but also keep someone happy ?
Give me one day to see whether it is doable ?
-- Wendy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
