On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:24:25PM -0400, Janne Karhunen wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Wendy Cheng <s.wendy.cheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Maybe I mislead you in previous post. The "-H" is only an "example" - to > > show people how to selectively move an ip address around without affecting > > other co-existing nfs ip interface on the same server. I did plan to submit > > a complete user mode patch so the program after "-H" will have a default > > executable (but user still can use their own if they don't like our nlm > > directory structure). > > Even if you ship the default executable user would > still need to go and edit it (add the address). Well, > I guess it would not be that much harder than > specifying the -n, but somehow this does seem > more arcane (for simple setups). In any case, if there's still a legimate use case for -n, even if it's not great, we should err on the side of fixing it just to save problems for anyone with an existing working setup. If -n has never worked at all for anyone, then OK, let's get rid of it. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
