On 03/01/2013 08:42 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Alan Jenkins
<alan.christopher.jenkins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/03/13 17:42, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Hi Marian,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Marian Marinov <mm@xxxxxx> wrote:
I have already patched my kmod with the -l option, would you be willing
to
add this option to kmod?
If so, I can polish the patch and send a pull request for it.
The problem with the previous implementation is that it's not really
listing the available modules. It's listing the modules known in the
index. It's kind of misleading. As stated in module-init-tools' man
page, it'd be better to use 'find' in the modules dir.
Why is it misleading if "modprobe --list" only shows results from the index?
That's consistent with the normal operation of modprobe.
However since you are not the first person asking for it, I think
there's some demand for this functionality. So, I'm thinking about
having it with another name just to avoid confusion.
I doubt the objection was to the name... I think it was just seen as
superfluous, not worth the effort of maintaining.
Yep, that was the original reason for removing a deprecated option.
The libkmod API expands slightly on the old implementation, so it could be
more natural to have --list now. (And maybe easier to implement?)
It's the same thing there's in module-init-tools. Not easier, not
harder. Just copy and paste.
One of the reasons I'm reluctant about "modprobe --list" is that I
don't want to expand the options to modprobe/insmod/lsmod and instead
treat they as the old interface, focusing on kmod commands/options.
Guys, would you please accept a patch to kmod, which reintroduce the -l/--list option?
Please, say yes.. I have machines that run Slackware and there the RPM solution I have for the Fedora does not work :(
Marian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
