On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:00:43 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a > > whole. But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :) > > I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an > > explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code... > > Andrew, > > Can you please take a look at this series? The thread starts at [1] and if > it'd be more convenient to you I can respin the whole set. It seems this hasn't happened - at least, I don't see the patches in linux-next. Unless somebody says something I think I'll just go ahead and merge the set. It all still applies cleanly enough, no conflicts against -next, and I'd hate to see this work fall through the cracks. jon
