On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 17:54:55 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Both bootmem and memblock have pretty good documentation coverage. With > some fixups and additions we get a nice overall description. > > v2 changes: > * address Randy's comments > > Mike Rapoport (11): > mm/bootmem: drop duplicated kernel-doc comments > docs/mm: nobootmem: fixup kernel-doc comments > docs/mm: bootmem: fix kernel-doc warnings > docs/mm: bootmem: add kernel-doc description of 'struct bootmem_data' > docs/mm: bootmem: add overview documentation > mm/memblock: add a name for memblock flags enumeration > docs/mm: memblock: update kernel-doc comments > docs/mm: memblock: add kernel-doc comments for memblock_add[_node] > docs/mm: memblock: add kernel-doc description for memblock types > docs/mm: memblock: add overview documentation > docs/mm: add description of boot time memory management So this seems like good stuff overall. It digs pretty deeply into the mm code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an mm developer. Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to pick the set up. Thanks, jon
