On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:47:30 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So this seems like good stuff overall. It digs pretty deeply into the mm > > code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an > > mm developer. Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to > > pick the set up. > > Jon, does Michal's reply [1] address your concerns? > Or should I respin and ask Andrew to pick it up? > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180712080006.GA328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a whole. But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :) I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code... Thanks, jon
