(added Andrew) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 06:02:49AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:47:30 +0300 > Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So this seems like good stuff overall. It digs pretty deeply into the mm > > > code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an > > > mm developer. Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to > > > pick the set up. > > > > Jon, does Michal's reply [1] address your concerns? > > Or should I respin and ask Andrew to pick it up? > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180712080006.GA328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a > whole. But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :) > I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an > explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code... Andrew, Can you please take a look at this series? The thread starts at [1] and if it'd be more convenient to you I can respin the whole set. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1530370506-21751-1-git-send-email-rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Thanks, > > jon > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
