Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
From: Piotr Hosowicz <piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:15:11 +0200
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4BB24A3F.4030908@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: hosowicz.com
References: <4B9FD5D1.8040203@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9FDAF3.9010804@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BB10A9D.7000506@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100329133809.af969338.rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BB1108C.60202@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100329143334.9b295e1d.rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BB12A8A.1040202@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100329153916.18afaf25.rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BB12D4C.7080904@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100329154852.5476ed2e.rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BB228CD.3050609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4BB23CF1.7090708@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4BB24A3F.4030908@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707)

Piotr Hosowicz wrote:

Same results with 2.6.34-rc3, I've just tested.


Same with 2.6.34-rc3-next-20100331+.

Regards,

Piotr Hosowicz

--
Z cyklu "Uroki demokracji", czyli pytania i odpowiedzi w teledurniejach:
- W którym mieście europejskim powstała pierwsza opera?
- Sydney.
NP: Peter Green Splinter Group - There's A River
NB: 2.6.34-rc3-next-20100331+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- Maybe my frequent kernel building could be of some help to the community? And how to build?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz
- Re: Maybe my frequent kernel building could be of some help to the community? And how to build?
  - From: Randy Dunlap
- Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz
- Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
  - From: Piotr Hosowicz

Prev by Date: Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
Next by Date: Re: Maybe my frequent kernel building could be of some help to the community? And how to build?
Previous by thread: Re: Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something?
Next by thread: [PATCH] .gitignore: ignore *.lzo files
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux&nblp;USB Development] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Secrets] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]