On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 06:08:50PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> > >
> > > static const int bmp580_odr_table[][2] = {
> > > @@ -1830,6 +1848,9 @@ static int bmp580_chip_config(struct bmp280_data *data)
> > >
> > > static const int bmp580_oversampling_avail[] = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 };
> > > static const u8 bmp580_chip_ids[] = { BMP580_CHIP_ID, BMP580_CHIP_ID_ALT };
> > > +/* Instead of { 1000, 16 } we do this, to avoid overflow issues */
> > > +static const int bmp580_temp_coeffs[] = { 125, 13 };
> >
> > I'm not really sure what we gain here from using 125/13 instead of
> > 250/14...but I don't think it hurts either.
> >
> > I don't have a way to test this with the latest kernel release
> > currently, but lgtm.
> >
> > Acked-by: Adam Rizkalla <ajarizzo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Series applied. Thanks
>
> Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you very much!
Cheers,
Vasilis
