> >
> > static const int bmp580_odr_table[][2] = {
> > @@ -1830,6 +1848,9 @@ static int bmp580_chip_config(struct bmp280_data *data)
> >
> > static const int bmp580_oversampling_avail[] = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 };
> > static const u8 bmp580_chip_ids[] = { BMP580_CHIP_ID, BMP580_CHIP_ID_ALT };
> > +/* Instead of { 1000, 16 } we do this, to avoid overflow issues */
> > +static const int bmp580_temp_coeffs[] = { 125, 13 };
>
> I'm not really sure what we gain here from using 125/13 instead of
> 250/14...but I don't think it hurts either.
>
> I don't have a way to test this with the latest kernel release
> currently, but lgtm.
>
> Acked-by: Adam Rizkalla <ajarizzo@xxxxxxxxx>
Series applied. Thanks
Jonathan
