On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 16:16:38 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2022 21:58:42 +0200 > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello Jonathan, > > > > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 02:38:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 May 2022 15:04:32 +0200 > > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Returning an error value in an i2c remove callback results in an error > > > > message being emitted by the i2c core, but otherwise it doesn't make a > > > > difference. > > > > > > > > As afe4404_remove() already emits an error message on failure and the > > > > additional error message by the i2c core doesn't add any useful > > > > information, change the return value to zero to suppress this message. > > > > > > > > This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Applied. > > > > > > Like the others this will sit in testing until I can rebase the togreg > > > branch. > > > > Don't know if it's to late to fix already, but I just noticed we'd want > > s/io/iio/ in the Subject line. > Good spot. Fixed up as haven't pushed the tree out as non rebasing yet > (I'm waiting as I normally rebase on rc1). > Might get delayed a little longer than that as I've just seen Greg has sent a late pull request for char-misc (unrelated to the IIO changes), so might need to wait a little past rc1. Jonathan > Jonathan > > > > > Best regards > > Uwe > > >
