On Sun, 22 May 2022 21:58:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Jonathan, > > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 02:38:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Sat, 14 May 2022 15:04:32 +0200 > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Returning an error value in an i2c remove callback results in an error > > > message being emitted by the i2c core, but otherwise it doesn't make a > > > difference. > > > > > > As afe4404_remove() already emits an error message on failure and the > > > additional error message by the i2c core doesn't add any useful > > > information, change the return value to zero to suppress this message. > > > > > > This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Applied. > > > > Like the others this will sit in testing until I can rebase the togreg > > branch. > > Don't know if it's to late to fix already, but I just noticed we'd want > s/io/iio/ in the Subject line. Good spot. Fixed up as haven't pushed the tree out as non rebasing yet (I'm waiting as I normally rebase on rc1). Jonathan > > Best regards > Uwe >
