Hello Jonathan, On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 02:38:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2022 15:04:32 +0200 > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Returning an error value in an i2c remove callback results in an error > > message being emitted by the i2c core, but otherwise it doesn't make a > > difference. > > > > As afe4404_remove() already emits an error message on failure and the > > additional error message by the i2c core doesn't add any useful > > information, change the return value to zero to suppress this message. > > > > This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Applied. > > Like the others this will sit in testing until I can rebase the togreg > branch. Don't know if it's to late to fix already, but I just noticed we'd want s/io/iio/ in the Subject line. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
