On 6 March 2018 13:04:31 GMT, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx> wrote: >On Ma, 2018-03-06 at 09:36 -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > >> > On 05.03.2018 17:30, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> > In general I think this is a great idea, however looking at it from >a >> > different angle - >> > Most of the supported metering circuits are already marked as not >> > recommended for new designs. >> > While Analog Devices have a very strong product portfolio in the >Metering IC >> > space, all of the parts in >> > staging/iio/meter are from 2011 and before and have already seen >multiple >> > product iterations since then. >> > A major rework of these drivers might require testing, >unfortunately these >> > drivers were developed by a different team which now pursues >different >> > responsibilities. >> > So I won’t be able to test them again, and therefore I’m also a bit >hesitant >> > to lift them out of staging. >> I have seen your message a few minutes ago, just after I sent a patch >> series that removes checkpatch problems from meter module. Anyway, >after >> your comments, I believe that is a better idea to work on another >module >> in the staging. Is that ok Daniel? > >Hi, > >I think it is still a good idea to make the checkpatch changes in the >meter directory >from staging. For work already done I agree but perhaps we can find a better target for effort going forward. Michael, what is the position on the CDC drivers and the resolver ones? Jonathan >> >> Just for curiosity, what is the process to remove meter from staging? > >Make sure we use the standard IIO interfaces, good quality code and >good testing :). > >thanks, >Daniel. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
