On Ma, 2018-03-06 at 09:36 -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > On 05.03.2018 17:30, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > In general I think this is a great idea, however looking at it from a
> > different angle -
> > Most of the supported metering circuits are already marked as not
> > recommended for new designs.
> > While Analog Devices have a very strong product portfolio in the Metering IC
> > space, all of the parts in
> > staging/iio/meter are from 2011 and before and have already seen multiple
> > product iterations since then.
> > A major rework of these drivers might require testing, unfortunately these
> > drivers were developed by a different team which now pursues different
> > responsibilities.
> > So I won’t be able to test them again, and therefore I’m also a bit hesitant
> > to lift them out of staging.
> I have seen your message a few minutes ago, just after I sent a patch
> series that removes checkpatch problems from meter module. Anyway, after
> your comments, I believe that is a better idea to work on another module
> in the staging. Is that ok Daniel?
Hi,
I think it is still a good idea to make the checkpatch changes in the meter directory
from staging.
>
> Just for curiosity, what is the process to remove meter from staging?
Make sure we use the standard IIO interfaces, good quality code and good testing :).
thanks,
Daniel.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��(��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
