On 11 Sep 27, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving > IIO out of the staging tree. > > I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers > along for the ride. > > Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence > preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by > stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set > back up as we go. > > My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship > of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and > sign off from me to explain where they came from). > > Right now my example set consists of > > ad799x - Michael's > max1363 - mine :) > tsl2583 - Amit's > adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine > and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's. > Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's > so, Michael, is that fine with you guys? > > So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether > they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd > obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look > at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github. > Yes, that'd be fine. I'll try to test out the changes/moves as we go but I won't be close to HW and a reliable internet connection over the next few weeks. /Amit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
