On 09/27/11 15:59, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 11 Sep 27, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving >> IIO out of the staging tree. >> >> I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers >> along for the ride. >> >> Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence >> preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by >> stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set >> back up as we go. >> >> My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship >> of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and >> sign off from me to explain where they came from). >> >> Right now my example set consists of >> >> ad799x - Michael's >> max1363 - mine :) >> tsl2583 - Amit's >> adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine >> and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's. >> Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's >> so, Michael, is that fine with you guys? >> >> So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether >> they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd >> obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look >> at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github. >> > > Yes, that'd be fine. I'll try to test out the changes/moves as we go but I > won't be close to HW and a reliable internet connection over the next few > weeks. > > /Amit > Not to worry. It's a rare thing but I actually have a part to test that particular driver (have a tsl2561) Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
