On 2023/02/08 21:17, marius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > February 8, 2023 1:40 AM, "Damien Le Moal" <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2023/02/08 3:40, marius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >>> [ 173.591831] ata2.15: Port Multiplier 1.2, 0x197b:0x0325 r193, 8 ports, feat 0xf/0x1f >>> [ 173.600838] ahci-mvebu f10a8000.sata: FBS is enabled >>> [ 173.605977] ata2.00: hard resetting link >>> [ 173.937078] ata2.00: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >>> [ 173.943563] ata2.01: hard resetting link >>> [ 174.277073] ata2.01: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >>> [ 174.283555] ata2.02: hard resetting link >>> [ 174.617075] ata2.02: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >>> [ 174.622787] ata2.03: hard resetting link >>> [ 174.957074] ata2.03: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >>> [ 174.962785] ata2.04: hard resetting link >>> [ 175.297075] ata2.04: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >>> [ 175.302784] ata2.05: hard resetting link >>> [ 175.637072] ata2.05: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >>> [ 175.642781] ata2.06: hard resetting link >>> [ 175.977071] ata2.06: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >>> [ 175.982781] ata2.07: hard resetting link >>> [ 176.317063] ata2.07: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> >> That is weird too. No point in repeatedly resetting if the link is up. So the >> patch really screwed up something for 5.15. > > Nothing weird here. There is one reset for each logical port. Only two ports are used. Ah! missed the port number changing :) You are right. > > I'm going to insert the debug messages in this kernel version too and test again. Thanks. Did you test the other LTS 6.1 kernel too ? The patch was backported there too. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
