On 6/1/2011 7:21 PM, David Dillow wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:51 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
"Asai Thambi Samymuthu Pattrayasamy (asamymuthupa) [CONTRACTOR]"
<asamymuthupa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Collected the perf data for ahci driver. As the call graph is getting
distorted in the email, attaching the perf data call graph report.
Thanks, Asai! I don't think cfq is the ideal I/O scheduler to be
testing. Could you run again with deadline and/or noop and see how that
changes your throughput and perf report? Also, just for completeness,
could you tell us which kernel you ran this against?
Did the cc list get trimmed, or was the message too big for vger? It
didn't seem to make it to the list...
If it was too big, could someone trim it down a bit and repost?
Inquiring minds want to play along at home...
Thanks!
That message with attachment was too big for vger.
Here is the attachment:
Filename | Description
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
perf_report_-g_ahci_txt : perf call graph for ahci driver with default
scheduler (cfq)
http://www.micron.com/get-document/?documentId=6771
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
