RE: New driver mtipx2xx submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Elevator for flash devices should automatically be null and most of
the
> SCSI layer isn't actually used so it would be interesting to know for
> example what shows up in comparative profiles so that it can be
optimised
> or dropped out.

Here is the performance number from some experiments.

Test System : 
	Dell Power Edge R710 (1 x Quad core processor @3.20GHz) 
OS:
	RHEL (Enterprise) ver5.5 x64 (2.6.18-194.el5)
Test Software:
	Vdbench ver 5.02

These experiments were done by changing the queue depth in
vdbench(Q=xxx).

                        |------------------------------------|
                        | ahci   |  ahci | mtipx2xx| mtipx2xx|
                        | Q=256  |  Q=32 |  Q=32   |  Q=256  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|4k random read (IOPS)  | 15,831 |15,763 | 244,795 | 783,778 |
|4k random write (IOPS) |  4,058 | 4,072 |  46,696 | 135,864 |
|128k seq. read (MBps)  |  2,284 | 2,258 |   3,295 |   3,060 |
|128k seq. write (MBps) |  1,049 | 1,053 |   2,092 |   2,078 |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux