Re: New driver mtipx2xx submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 5/11/2011 1:20 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> So a bigger queue helped (at least in 2006). The AHCI driver can be
>> taught your bigger queue easily enough. The question is where with a
>> *current* kernel are any remaining bottlenecks if you do that and how do
>> we fix them.
>
> Attached image/table shows the performance numbers on current kernel.
>
> The main objectives of our new mtipx2xx driver are
> 	1.) highest performance (see attached image/table),
> 	2.) lowest CPU utilization, and

Can you collect perf data to show why the ahci driver is taking up so
much more CPU for the random I/O case?

Thanks,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux