Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
index b80d2e7..80fb1f9 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static inline u8 ata_busy_wait(struct at
static inline u8 ata_wait_idle(struct ata_port *ap)
{
- u8 status = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ, 1000);
+ u8 status = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ, 200000);
Ouch. That will slow down boot for a lot of otherwise-untouched users,
Really? If a drive claims to be BUSY, then it shouldn't accept a new command.
But yes, this may be a bit too mainline to risk at this point,
given controller quirks and the like that may be spoofing the status.
Cheers
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
