On Sat, May 27 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >index b80d2e7..80fb1f9 100644
> >--- a/include/linux/libata.h
> >+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
> >@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static inline u8 ata_busy_wait(struct at
> >
> > static inline u8 ata_wait_idle(struct ata_port *ap)
> > {
> >- u8 status = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ, 1000);
> >+ u8 status = ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ, 200000);
>
>
> Ouch. That will slow down boot for a lot of otherwise-untouched users,
> if that makes it in... :(
Not proposing it for inclusion, just posted what I had in entirety to
avoid confusion. I made that change to potentially avoid recompiling
again for retesting. I can test without that too, I guess I will now
because we have no clear results so far.
--
Jens Axboe
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
