Re: [PATCH v4 0/12] ptrace: cleaning up ptrace_stop
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/12] ptrace: cleaning up ptrace_stop
- From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 10:18:32 -0500
- Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <Ynp6fP8QkIGvUT1T@linutronix.de> (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's message of "Tue, 10 May 2022 16:45:16 +0200")
- References: <20220421150248.667412396@infradead.org> <20220421150654.817117821@infradead.org> <87czhap9dy.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <878rrrh32q.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87k0b7v9yk.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87k0b0apne.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87a6bv6dl6.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220510141119.GA23277@redhat.com> <87lev9xy3n.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <Ynp6fP8QkIGvUT1T@linutronix.de>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2022-05-10 09:26:36 [-0500], Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Does anyone else have any comments on this patchset?
>>
>> If not I am going to apply this to a branch and get it into linux-next.
>
> Looks good I guess.
> Be aware that there will be clash due to
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1649240981-11024-3-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> which sits currently in -akpm.
Thanks for the heads up. That looks like the best kind of conflict.
One where code just disappears.
Eric
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]