Re: [PATCH v4 0/12] ptrace: cleaning up ptrace_stop
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/12] ptrace: cleaning up ptrace_stop
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 16:11:21 +0200
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <87a6bv6dl6.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
- References: <20220421150248.667412396@infradead.org> <20220421150654.817117821@infradead.org> <87czhap9dy.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <878rrrh32q.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87k0b7v9yk.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87k0b0apne.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87a6bv6dl6.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On 05/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Eric W. Biederman (11):
> signal: Rename send_signal send_signal_locked
> signal: Replace __group_send_sig_info with send_signal_locked
> ptrace/um: Replace PT_DTRACE with TIF_SINGLESTEP
> ptrace/xtensa: Replace PT_SINGLESTEP with TIF_SINGLESTEP
> ptrace: Remove arch_ptrace_attach
> signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of assert_spin_locked
> ptrace: Reimplement PTRACE_KILL by always sending SIGKILL
> ptrace: Document that wait_task_inactive can't fail
> ptrace: Admit ptrace_stop can generate spuriuos SIGTRAPs
> ptrace: Don't change __state
> ptrace: Always take siglock in ptrace_resume
>
> Peter Zijlstra (1):
> sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
OK, lgtm.
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
I still dislike you removed TASK_WAKEKILL from TASK_TRACED, but I can't
find a good argument against it ;) and yes, this is subjective.
Oleg.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]