> >As I understood from your previous mail, a plain revert is less broken > >but still broken. Applying a correct fix is my preferred way. > > Actually, from the -stable kernel perspective, a single patch would > complicate backporting. So could you please reconsider? I don't see why. If we have two patches, the state inbetween them is broken. And we don't have two patches yet, just the revert. So, the result is broken anyhow. Can you elaborate?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
