Hello. On 8/24/2014 10:45 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
This reverts commit 150b8be3cda54412ad7b54f5392b513b25c0aaa7.
The I2C core's per-adapter locks can't protect from IRQs, so the driver still needs a spinlock to protect the register accesses.
Looks to me like a plain revert. What about the issues you mentioned? Don't you want to fix them? Confused...
You told me to do 2 patches, one of them just revert. Here you are. As for the follow up patch, I need to think a bit more, so all in a good time.
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
