Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: mvebu: Add quirk for i2c for the OpenBlocks AX3-4 board

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/01/2014 22:14, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:12:41PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> Jason,
>> On 10/01/2014 21:08, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:05:21PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:22:40PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we create new compatible strings to indicate errata, or to indicate
>>>>>> 'from this version forward there are new features'?  The former would
>>>>>> indicate as Gregory has written '...-a0-i2c', the latter would warrant
>>>>>> '...-b0-i2c' and disabling offloading if we don't see '...-b0-i2c'.
>>>>
>>>> s/-b0-i2c'./-b0-i2c' or newer./
>>>>
>>>>> IMHO the compatible string should represent a specific HW/SW ABI. So
>>>>> you need a unique compatible string for every variation of that ABI.
>>>>
>>>> My concern is that we tend to do things like "marvell,orion-sata" for
>>>> the first version of the IP block we can work with.  orion5x, kirkwood,
>>>> dove, and armada 370/xp all use that compatible string to refer to that
>>>> IP block.
>>>>
>>>> Given that we look at it as 'and newer', '...-a0-i2c' would mean no
>>>> offloading until we introduce '-b0-i2c'.  Or am I mis-understanding what
>>>> you're saying?
>>>>
>>>>> We already have a compatible string defined for the ABI that B0
>>>>> presents.
>>>>
>>>> So 'mv78230-i2c' is newer than 'mv78230-a0-i2c', or are you referring to
>>>> something else?
>>>
>>> I think the crux of it is:  Is mv78230-i2c the first, or the default?
>>
>> Here it's clearly the default
> 
> So we should default to no offloading when we see it?  Since it has been
> deployed referring to -a0 revision i2c IP blocks?
> 

But this assumption is wrong as I already wrote few days ago, mv78230-i2c
has been deployed referring to -b0 revision i2c IP blocks since the begining.

It was developed on and for B0 version, and this compatible was created for
this specific version. It was latter that we realized that it was not fully
compatible with A0. But for sure:

mv78230-i2c == I2C IP running on Armada XP B0 (or latter)

> thx,
> 
> Jason.
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux