On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:22:40PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > Do we create new compatible strings to indicate errata, or to indicate > 'from this version forward there are new features'? The former would > indicate as Gregory has written '...-a0-i2c', the latter would warrant > '...-b0-i2c' and disabling offloading if we don't see '...-b0-i2c'. IMHO the compatible string should represent a specific HW/SW ABI. So you need a unique compatible string for every variation of that ABI. We already have a compatible string defined for the ABI that B0 presents. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html