Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: mvebu: Add quirk for i2c for the OpenBlocks AX3-4 board

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:05:21PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:22:40PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> 
> > Do we create new compatible strings to indicate errata, or to indicate
> > 'from this version forward there are new features'?  The former would
> > indicate as Gregory has written '...-a0-i2c', the latter would warrant
> > '...-b0-i2c' and disabling offloading if we don't see '...-b0-i2c'.

s/-b0-i2c'./-b0-i2c' or newer./

> IMHO the compatible string should represent a specific HW/SW ABI. So
> you need a unique compatible string for every variation of that ABI.

My concern is that we tend to do things like "marvell,orion-sata" for
the first version of the IP block we can work with.  orion5x, kirkwood,
dove, and armada 370/xp all use that compatible string to refer to that
IP block.

Given that we look at it as 'and newer', '...-a0-i2c' would mean no
offloading until we introduce '-b0-i2c'.  Or am I mis-understanding what
you're saying?

> We already have a compatible string defined for the ABI that B0
> presents.

So 'mv78230-i2c' is newer than 'mv78230-a0-i2c', or are you referring to
something else?

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux