Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: mvebu: Add quirk for i2c for the OpenBlocks AX3-4 board

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gregory, Arnd,

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 04:06:27PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> The first variants of Armada XP SoCs (A0 stepping) have issues related
> to the i2c controller which prevent to use the offload mechanism and
> lead to a kernel hang during boot.
> 
> This commit add quirk in the mvebu platform code to check the SoC
> version and then update the compatible string for the i2c controller
> according to the revision of the SoC. Currently only some OpenBlocks
> AX3-4 boards are known to use an A0 revision so the check is done only
> for these boards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
> index e2acff98e750..0f61a4f22fb5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/mbus.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
>  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
> @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include "armada-370-xp.h"
>  #include "common.h"
>  #include "coherency.h"
> +#include "mvebu-soc-id.h"
>  
>  static void __init armada_370_xp_map_io(void)
>  {
> @@ -45,8 +47,38 @@ static void __init armada_370_xp_timer_and_clk_init(void)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> +static void __init i2c_quirk(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	u32 dev, rev;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only revisons more recent than A0 support the offload
> +	 * mechanism. We can exit only if we are sure that we can
> +	 * get the SoC revision and it is more recent than A0.
> +	 */
> +	if (mvebu_get_soc_id(&rev, &dev) == 0 && dev > MV78XX0_A0_REV)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "marvell,mv78230-i2c") {
> +		struct property *new_compat;
> +
> +		new_compat = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_compat), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +		new_compat->name =  kstrdup("compatible", GFP_KERNEL);
> +		new_compat->length =  sizeof("marvell,mv78230-a0-i2c");
> +		new_compat->value =  kstrdup("marvell,mv78230-a0-i2c",
> +						GFP_KERNEL);

I'm still having some trouble with this compatible string choice...  But
I have refined the problem :)

Do we create new compatible strings to indicate errata, or to indicate
'from this version forward there are new features'?  The former would
indicate as Gregory has written '...-a0-i2c', the latter would warrant
'...-b0-i2c' and disabling offloading if we don't see '...-b0-i2c'.

I can see Gregory's approach if he were still using the property
'offload-broken', but I suspect the compatible strings should be handled
differently.

thx,

Jason.

> +
> +		of_update_property(np, new_compat);
> +	}
> +	return;
> +}
> +
>  static void __init armada_370_xp_dt_init(void)
>  {
> +	if (of_machine_is_compatible("plathome,openblocks-ax3-4"))
> +		i2c_quirk();
>  	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux